Saturday, May 21, 2011

Sephora, your website is useless!

21 May, 2010

Dear Sephora,

We know you are touted, and tout yourself as the Alpha & Omega of Makeup, the one and only place toget the highest quality makeup with tips and tools to get the most out of your makeup. This is only partially true; its true of your stores, the brick and mortar shopping experience.

Anyone who's ventured in a Sephora for the first time is immediately inspired/overwhelmed/excited, especially if you live somewhere more rural than not. Music, lighting, rows and rows of makeup, it all is very fun.  You can try on makeup, wipe it away with a makeup remover and repeat all day. You can ignore or accept the help of the Sephora consultants.  They'll do your makeup too, of course.  The aisles and aisles of makeup let you try this or that shade without having to buy it first.  Mirrors and makeup applicators abound. They carry many brands, and you can browse them all.  They have a hair care section, a skin care section, and many 'best buys' and 'highest rated' products are displayed prominently at the store entrance and throughout the store. Almost always an enjoyable experience, Sephora has clearly invested a lot of time and research into developing these little makeup meccas.

This is... if you can find the store. Thus begins my tirade known as Sephora, your website is useless!  Let us go to Exhibit A. Sephora's "Store Locator."  Sephoras are now in many metropolitan areas. If you're in or near a city, you probably know where it is and can get there with ease.  But what if you're Mz. Smith of California traveling to New Jersey for the first time on business, and you have a free weekend. Well it is winter so Smith doesn't want to go to beach at Seaside Heights so she thinks about going to a Sephora. So she pulls up the internet, and goes to the Store Locator.

"What?" she says

"They don't just let me type in my current zip code? This is less than acceptable in today's society. Preferably I either enter the whole address (and then the subsequent results will map out all the locations nearby, then click one and it spits out directions) or I can enter my zip only for quicker results. This is the way of the internet."

But Ms. Smith is on Sephora's site in 2011, not a regular up to date site. She sees this inexplicable DROP DOWN MENU (UGH!!!) and then proceeds to gamely pick her state from this.

"Ok, New Jersey, fine."  Then what?

Exhibit A
"ANOTHER DROP DOWN MENU!!!  FUUUUUUU!!!!"

It lists the locations of Sephora stores in Jersey.  This is unhelpful. Mz. Smith looks but doesn't see the small NJ town she's currently in listed on the drop down menu. Of course at this point she could google map each of the 20 or so locations and then compare that to where she currently lives, but who has time for that??

"F it!" she says.

"I'll just go to Atlantic City, at least I can map that."

Mz. Smith goes on to spend her life savings, her parents retirement fund, and her kid's college fund all in that weekend, and she goes home a broken, bitter woman.

If only Sephora let you put in your zip code, this tragedy would not have occurred.

This concludes Exhibit A.

Exhibit B (the last exhibit) is the other half of the equation. Call it sorting, drilling down, browsing, or just plain old shopping; it is hard to do on Sephora.com. You'd think Sephora would want the purchasing of makeup, the deciding and browsing, a fun part of the experience.  Makeup shopping shouldn't be a chore, riddled with drop down menus from the late 90's.  Makeup shopping should know who you are, remember your preferences, and suggest things for you to try based on that. It should be a complete, customizable experience.

The closest thing I've seen in my browsing past is at Zappos, where you can choose exactly the kind of bag or shoe you want based on your criteria.
 
Exhibit B: Zappos sorting.  (A joy to navigate! I can even choose Polyester as a fabric!!!! :) :) :))




At its most basic, browsing/shopping on the internet can be a drill down type of event as seen with Zappos.  Pick among a whole bunch of criteria which matter to you, and end up with what you like.  Sephora's makeup site starts out that way:
Exhibit B Continued, the basic, uninspired drill down link navigation system.

You pick skincare: face: visible pores. So far so good. But from there the shopping experience deteriorates quickly. Once you've gone that far, common courtesy demands you have the path you have traveled thus far listed at the top. 
I'm clicking, I can highlight, but I can't navigate.
Sephora has this, but  the navigation isn't clickable. So if you just want to go back to face, well you're SOL and need to click the back button instead of what is clearly marked "Face.". See #1 in the image below.

 How simple is this? Common navigational courtesies like this should be law, like using a turn signal.
annoying complex setup

Then, #2, they have "Narrrow by Brand" and "Sort By".  Instead of keeping the same website structure they revert to terrible, awful drop down menus.

First, "Narrow By Brand" yes, very nice you let us do this. But why is it in a drop down menu instead of another drill down menu?  Why are you inconsistent Sephora?  Why?????

Then you have "Sort By."And there aren't even any compelling criteria. What if you don't know what brand you are looking for, you just want the highest customer rating makeup for eyes that is for oily skin, is oil free, and not tested on animals. Not going to happen.

Very impressive, we can narrow down by brand. 
But what if I like "gasp" two or more brands?




First I have to go to Drugstore.com to see the reviews and figure out if any are my skin type, then look on Drugstore.com and Amazon.com for reviews and ingredients, and last I have to go to LeapingBunny.com to see if it's tested on animals. Exhausting!


#3 if I click that I want to View All results, it will work for that page and all the other pages of the search I've just done.  However, if I make a new search all that data is lost and I'm looking at 12 results per page again until I go and select View All again. Unnecessarily evil!
This second 'search by brand' menu takes you off
your current search altogether, adding further aggravation and complexity.
And as if it weren't there already, you can choose by brand in the alternate, upper right drop down menu bar.  We understand that brands think they are important in the makeup world, but if I can get something with the same ingredients for 70% less, I'd rather get the cheaper one.  But how will we ever find out if you pigeon hole us into brands? 

So Sephora, how can you possibly place your name on a website like this? Is there any way to correct this?  What are the next steps?

I will make it easy on you.  First, go over to Zappos, Ebay, ebags, whoever, and hire their entire web development team.  Then make the browsing experience enjoyable for all of us, please!

Sephora's Great 8 Suggestions:

1. Your customers have accounts from orders, just use that to make it more customized. If we give you the info, store our skin type, age, gender, hair type (straight, or curly - and if curly, what type of curls from 2A - 4c?), natural hair color, if we dye our hair, etc, etc.  Keep all that info and you can use it to 'suggest' products to us on the margins, and to enhance our search experience.  If I am 60 and don't want to always see tiger striped eye makeup and the latest in glitter nail polish, let us "like" or "dislike" the little suggestions and you can learn about us (a la facebook ads). You get our free customer data! (just sayin) and we get a more relevant browsing experience.

2. If we want to see 5,000,000,000 results per page just remember that from one visit to the next, not just within one search.

3. Add these search criteria categories:
  • Average Customer Review (can't believe you don't have that one.) 
  • Skin type if applicable
  • Coloring (warm, cool, neutral)
  • Cruelty Free/Not Tested on Animals
  • Ingredients (desired). If there is a new ingredient out there that we want to try in our makeup, let us search for it.
  • Ingredients (undesired). If we have allergies or don't want something in our product, let us search for things that don't contain this ingredient.  The next few are ingredients that are common (infamous) enough to warrant their own categories. People can ignore them or sort by them. Or better yet choose this in their preferences for ALL FUTURE SEARCHES!
  • Oil Free
  • Paraben Free (haircare)
  • Sulfate Free (haircare)
4.  Show us reviews or at least average ratings from other sites.  On a product detail page I should be able to see its rating on amazon, drugstore.com, makeupalley, as well as Sephora reviews.

5. A product comparison side by side would be nice.  Let us choose three different lipsticks and then compare them side by side.  Highlight the ingredient differences if we want. Let us, the consumer figure out what formulations work on our own skin. Let us educate ourselves and we will have a more democratic, equitable & progressive makeup industry at our beck and call, falling over themselves to do what the consumers want, not dictating to us what we need. You could change the industry instead of bowing to them.

6. Let us see the demographics (if shared) of other reviewers.  If I have dry skin I don't want to see the reviews of a moisturizing cream from oily-skinned individuals. Save other reviewers with similar classifications as myself (age, skin type) as Sephora Friends, and be alerted whenever they try something and write a review.

7. Please let us search by zip code for the nearest store, it's not that hard. Get with the times.

8. keep it FUN! It's MAKEUP!! If we want to spend 60 hours a week just browsing let us do it on your site. You'd rather be the website we all go to. We'd rather have a one-stop-browsing-shop.

There are many other things that you could do Sephora, to make your website better besides these  suggestions. But at least they are a start.  There are probably Sephora employees reading this and nodding, saying "I know, I know.." but somewhere, someone is holding up progress. Let's take it to the next level Sephora.  Turn your site intowhat it could and should be.  An online makeup mecca worthy of the Sephora brand.

This has been for your own good.

Sincerely,

this blogger

Friday, May 13, 2011

Vacuum Cleaner Series: Bissell: Fat, Bloated Back-Killers. You'd need one on every floor.

A quick few clicks and I have all I need to know.

If you're picking up a Bissell, expect it to be 22 lbs. Because that's how heavy almost all of them are.


The Heavy Duty Vacuum, the heavyweight champ weighs in at 35 lbs.!  Imagine toting that up and down the stairs.  These aren't the shampooers, these are just the plain old uprights.

To be fair, their PROLite is 'only' 16 lbs. Get me out of here!

Vacuum Cleaner Series: Dyson - let's get it over with already

Since we all want to compare every vacuum out there to a Dyson, let's look at their uprights.

DC28 Animal ($600.00): 21 lbs. - 245 watts
DC25 Animal ($550.00): 16 lbs. - 220 watts
DC25 All Floors ($500.00): 16 lbs. - 220 watts
DC24 Animal ($450.00): 12 lbs. - 115 watts
DC33 MultiFloor ($400.00): 18 lbs.  - 240 watts
DC35 MultiFloor Cordless ($300.00 - looks like an
overgrown leaf blower): 5 lbs. - Bingo! - 65 watts but can only run for 15 minutes. Darn.

The uprights pretty much all have wonderful telescoping hoses that can clean a whole flight of stairs, but that comes with added weight as we can see. They are gorgeous, they have a great website, fantastic reviews, and expensive photography, but they're heavy.

21 pounds?  You sure are gorgeous but you'll need to get rid of that extra weight.

Vacuum Cleaner Series: Dirt Devil

They offer 12 different varieties of upright vacs. Twelve!

I mean, you need three for a high, mid, and low range.  Then maybe some in-between.  Like Oreck, they had, what 6 which is plenty sufficient.  I hope I'm not going to compare everyone with Oreck now.

On to Dirt Devil. For a quick test of the water I usually will check out the reviews on Amazon. and D.D. has some low reviews out there:

Extreme Quick: 2/5
Featherlite Bagless: 2.5/5
Ultra Swivel Glide & Reaction: 3.5/5
Breeze Bagless, Optima Lightweight, Featherlite Bagged: 4/5

I'll look at the three that had 4 stars. The two, Optima isn't on their website.
"Featherlite" is 11lbs, "Breeze" is 13.15 (at least they're accurate). No Hepa filtration (the Featherlite has "Micro Fresh" Filtration, but they do have on-board tools (maybe that is the extra weight)). Not that impressed, let's find their best.

Sorting by price, their most expensive upright is the $90 Ultra Vision Turbo Vacuum. It has all the bells and whistles, including actual Hepa filters, and weighs in at a whopping 19 lbs! Do they expect people to carry that up and down the stairs?

Think of all the Chiropractor visits!

Sorry, but your lackluster reviews and lack of any attempt to make vacuums lighter in the world we live in gives you a big Thumbs Down. Dirt Devil seems like the cheap vacuum you get that will last a good 3 years.

Maybe if you cared as much about product development as social media your uprights would be under 10 lbs.

Vacuum Cleaner Series: Oreck

Oh Oreck.

You almost had me.

Shopping the other day and happened by an Oreck shop.  Since I am fastidiously researching for this Vac Series, I stopped in to see what they had to offer.  The saleswoman was just wonderful.  The showroom had all their models out and waiting for you to try on wood, carpet, dirt, and their own heaps of "pet hair".  The vacs were lightweight, and if you bring in your old clunker vac you get $50 off a new one!  The problem here is that none of them had a hose, so you need another vac to do that part. But, as the saleswoman explained, that is why they can make their powerful vacs so lightweight. This changes everything.

Oreck's Pros:
  • Actual stores
  • Once you buy, you can bring it back once a year for 10 years and they'll replace whatever it needs and keep it running for you.
  • Uses bags so cleanup is easy (see image on direct suction below)
  • $$$ when you trade in your old vac
  • Relatively inexpensive, you can get a really good one for around $200 (I mean $150 if you have a trade in)
  • Hepa Filtration
  • Looooong 35ft cords
  • Eco friendly Bright LED lights
  • Most models between 7 - 9 lbs!
  • Last for years

 Oreck's Cons:
  • They're getting better, but they still look like every vacuum you've seen in a hotel 
  • No hose, need a separate vac for that
  • Oreck sounds like Ogre and Shrek and is awkward to say.  "Yes, I have an Oreck Vacuum. I live in Britain, now lets go have some tea, shall we?"  
  • Um...

As weird as it sounds, I might be less suspicious if it cost $800. Why is it so good and so cheap?  How can they make money when they last that long and are $200-$300 and Dysons cost $600? I know there is a marketing theory that applies here.

At this point it comes to do you want a hose or not, and do you mind having to change a bag (although it's touted as quick and easy, it still needs to be done bagless or not). But I think we have a contender here. They come in lots of different color combinations, some more modern than others.

If I would have had my old vac in the car I would have been sorely tempted to trade it in right then and there.  Not sure what I would have done.

Pieces

The Iceberg killed Titanic
Strewn 'cross the ocean floor
But what happened to bunny
That turned her into gore?

A polished feat of marvel
For wealth and the well-heeled
England, Ireland, New York bound
Is now a debris field

Her maiden voyage started
And cut short by the smack
In 70 years they found her front
Days later found her back

A bunny borne but weeks ago
Nestled in mother's womb
Life all ahead but now is dead
A trash can now her tomb

Bun's first peek out the burrow
Met Kittens unrestrained
And hours later I found her
In pieces more than twain

One leg, one leg, one body
Here lies the bunny dead
One leg, one leg, one body
I cannot find the head

~ RIP little bunny

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Vacuum Cleaner Series: Kirby

C'mon, let me in your house to try and convince you to buy.
Kirby. I'm starting with Kirby because my mom got one in the 70's. I grew up with Kirby. In fact, she only replaced it around 2008 with the Dyson Animal, the purple one.  Let's say it cost $700 back then, pretty good investment, what $30 a year for the thing.  Kirby thinks themselves as the high end of vacs, the Tiffany in a sea of Kmarts.  And while they may be all they're cracked up to be, you and I will never know because none of their models are sold online. You must contact a dealer who will then schedule an appointment for them to come to your house.  They will let you try it, they might even shampoo a room for you while you watch. Yes, they last a long time, but I can't possibly recommend them above others due to no specs being online. How a company can operate like this I do not know.

Hey Kirby, if you're trying to keep your secrets from their competitors, it's also keeping it a secret from me, a potential 2nd generation customer.  At least list the current models on your website, and some basic features of them. I don't buy anything over $100 without researching the crap out of it online first. So you're not even a contender.

While we're at it, want some Encyclopedias?

Vacuum Cleaner Series: The problem with Vacuums

Clunky, heavy, loud, annoying.  If anything can make cleaning less appealing it is the common household vacuum cleaner. Dusting is easy, just spray and wipe.  Sweeping and then mopping the kitchen floor? I have no problem there. But when it is time to go into the closet and dig out the prehistoric behemoths that inhabit each floor of my house (yes I have two, more on that later), it fills my soul with dread.

Why the inescapable feeling of being lead to my doom?  The answer is poor design. Today marks a day where I will add a new keyword to my blog: awful. Vacuums are awful, everyone knows it, but I'm going to try and quantify why in my Vacuum Cleaner Series.  The ambition here is to examine a Vac company until most of them are exhausted, and then at the end proclaim that either yes, advances have been made, or that no, there is no hope despite all the industry hype.

Hey, that looks familiar.Did it even change at all?
Who could guess that 103 years later it would still suck?

Maybe I'll look in-depth at features such as the inner workings of Hepa filtration and retractable cords, but for the most part this will merely examine the modern vacuums of today through layman's eyes.  I intend to determine if any vacs are worthy per my criteria as follows:

THE LIST - is it too much to ask?

  • Weight. This oft overlooked aspect of the vac is, in my opinion the most important aspect.  So what if it can suck your pets into it from the other room if it can't perform this basic of requirements.  Be Light.  Be transportable. If I want to vacuum my entire house in 20 minutes because company is on its way, I should be able to do that without back pain the next day from a 20 lb vacuum. 
  • Falling over. This happens all the time. Today might be the day I spend a good solid 30 minutes just on one room with the vac.  I have my upright with its hose attachment, so I get out the hose and do my baseboards, pulling the rest of the vac with me as I go. But the upright portion falls over. Again, and again.  Why isn't it stable, especially since it weighs so much? This has happened with any upright I've ever used with a hose. 
  • The cord situation. Vacuuming itself is drudgery. But ad to that the wrapping and unwrapping of the cord before and after every episode and it makes me want to live in a hut with dirt floors. At least you don't have to wrap and unwrap a cord with a broom. Retractable cords end up breaking and you have to wrap it anyway. And the entire time you vacuum, while your one hand is torqued to push and pull & your back is bent over, your other hand is the designated cord corraller. Woe to those who run over the cord with the vac, it usually chews it up. And once you reach the end of your cord leash, you need to walk the whole way back to unplug it, then plug it in somewhere closer to finish the job. 
  • Emptying. Some people prefer bags, some bagless. Whatever it is, make it simple and not messy. 
  • Hepa Filters. Shouldn't they be in all vacuums by now?
  • Profile. It should be low so you can go under the furniture.
  • Loudness.  Can it be toned down a bit?
  • Suction. It should suck well, not badly.  It should pick up that piece of lint on the floor without me going over it 100 times.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Ballet Stretching

There was a young dancer from Surrey
Who tried to improve in a hurry
Leaned on her kneecap
Pushed hard till it snapped
And now she's trussed up in a gurney